tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14743001.post5482751079271652324..comments2024-01-02T02:45:17.328-06:00Comments on Notes from Dr. RW: Commercially supported CME: my response to Daniel CarlatRobert W Donnellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16944231400440786271noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14743001.post-76897136394956707182008-08-19T08:43:00.000-05:002008-08-19T08:43:00.000-05:00Anon 7:22 AM---Know that I intend to view future M...Anon 7:22 AM---<BR/>Know that I intend to view future Medscape CME articles to which I link with a critical eye and comment accordingly.Robert W Donnellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16944231400440786271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14743001.post-80733845355170212022008-08-19T07:22:00.000-05:002008-08-19T07:22:00.000-05:00I must respectfully disagree. I have followed Meds...I must respectfully disagree. I have followed Medscape information since 2003 and regularly find inaccuracies or ommissions, it to be uncritical, and always spun in favor of its sponsors. The CME is generally less extreme than their articles, but it is still not a source I would ever trust or recommend for the full story or base my practice on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com