Background
In a trial comparing
coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone with CABG plus
mitral-valve repair in patients with moderate ischemic mitral
regurgitation, we found no significant difference in the left
ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) or survival after 1
year. Concomitant mitral-valve repair was associated with a reduced
prevalence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, but patients
had more adverse events. We now report 2-year outcomes.
Methods
We randomly assigned
301 patients to undergo either CABG alone or the combined procedure.
Patients were followed for 2 years for clinical and echocardiographic
outcomes…
Conclusions
In patients with
moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing CABG, the addition
of mitral-valve repair did not lead to significant differences in
left ventricular reverse remodeling at 2 years. Mitral-valve repair
provided a more durable correction of mitral regurgitation but did
not significantly improve survival or reduce overall adverse events
or readmissions and was associated with an early hazard of increased
neurologic events and supraventricular arrhythmias.
No comments:
Post a Comment