Background
Evidence-based
recommendations do not adequately address the treatment of right
heart thrombi in patients who present with acute symptomatic
pulmonary embolism.
Methods
This study included
patients who had acute pulmonary embolism associated with right heart
thrombi and participated in the Registro Informatizado de la
Enfermedad TromboEmbólica registry. We assessed the effectiveness of
anticoagulation versus reperfusion treatment for the outcomes of
all-cause mortality, pulmonary embolism–related mortality,
recurrent venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding rates through 30
days after initiation of pulmonary embolism treatment. We used
propensity score matching to adjust for the likelihood of receiving
reperfusion treatment.
Results
Of 325 patients with
pulmonary embolism and right heart thrombi, 255 (78%; 95% confidence
interval, 74-83) received anticoagulation and 70 (22%; 95% confidence
interval, 17-26) also received reperfusion treatment. Propensity
score–matched pairs analyses did not detect a statistically lower
risk of all-cause death (6.2% vs 14%, P = .15) or pulmonary
embolism–related mortality (4.7% vs 7.8%; P = .47) for reperfusion
compared with anticoagulation. Of the patients who received
reperfusion treatment, 6.2% had a recurrence during the study
follow-up period, compared with 0% of those who received
anticoagulation (P = .049). The incidence of major bleeding events
was not statistically different between the 2 treatment groups (3.1%
vs 3.1%; P = 1.00).
Conclusions
In patients with
pulmonary embolism and right heart thrombi, no significant difference
was found between reperfusion therapy and anticoagulant therapy for
mortality and bleeding. The risk of recurrences was significantly
higher for reperfusion therapy compared with anticoagulation. Right
heart thrombi may not warrant riskier interventions than standard
anticoagulation.
No comments:
Post a Comment